Discussion about this post

User's avatar
My GloB's avatar

This is excellent reporting, thank you! It always amazes me how close so-called 'capitalism' and 'communism' are to each other when centralised control whether through the party or government and business regulation remain stubbornly at the helm.

Also, I realise reading your analysis how marketing (including propaganda) has become the centrepiece of both economic systems in their most representative territories (US & China).

All the way, and as you well point out, the plight of the farmer, the rural family, remains the same or perhaps worse (with notable exceptions), not only do they remain totally dependent on the weather (for the most part unavoidable), but now depend equally and fatefully on government. Are 2 dependencies better than one?

Expand full comment
things and nothings's avatar

“Rural China doesn’t need land reform, higher wages, or major policy shifts—just a good internet connection and a smartphone.”

Why, why, WHY is the solution always to further centralize services onto these devices? I was just complaining the other day that having one’s entire life tied up into a phone strips life of a bit of color. Convenience is the name of the game, more so in China than anywhere else, but is it even all that good? It’s taking over as the only viable means of living. Of course, it does come with its benefits, like the 一网通办 you brought up. But it means you NEED a phone, and thus extend the surveillance state, increasing likelihood of douyin addiction and scams.

If China really can up their farming game, the world would be better off, but only if there are good channels for trade. Otherwise, most of it is blowing smoke.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts